RCF Mining Market Commentary: Q424

Commodity and Mining Investment Quarterly Update

Commodity Insights

The re-election of Donald Trump to the US presidency was one development in the fourth quarter of 2024 that was particularly noteworthy. RCF does not comment on political events; however, the organization must understand how the world has changed and thoughtfully consider what it means for both existing and new investments. Recognizing the change in US leadership, but equally recognizing most commodities are consumed ex-USA, Q4 2024 sets the stage for what will come next.     

To understand the global picture, a logical starting point is to consider the performance of the global mining sector within the context of the broader global equity market basket.  RCF spent some time considering which index best represents each market, as highlighted below:

  • RCF market -> MSCI World Metals & Mining, ticker: MXWO0MM Index
  • World market -> MSCI All Country (ACWI) Index, ticker: MXWD Index

While no index is perfect, the ratio of these two indices does provide a perspective of whether investment is flowing into or retreating from the metals & mining sector (numerator) relative to the whole of global equities (denominator).      

Figure 1: Global Mining vs. Global Equity Market (index ratio)

The chart above shows the metals & mining sector currently sitting at one of its lowest ratio levels (relative to the global equity basket) in the past 30 years, specifically at a ratio of 0.36 as of 31 Dec 2024.   This compares with an average of:

  • 0.48 average ratio since 2015 (10-year average), or
  • 0.71 average ratio since 1995 (30-year average)

From such a low relative ratio, there is asymmetrical upside value in metals & mining should markets revert to the mean.  For investors looking to either reallocate or increase their exposure to the metals & mining sector, the current investment environment provides an attractive entry point.  

Secondly, metals & mining equities have broadly matched the performance of the global equity basket over the past 10 years.  The ratio has been broadly flat since 2015.   Underneath the ratio calculation, both indices have risen over the past 10 years, so investors haven’t necessarily lost any ground to the global equity basket with a metals & mining allocation. 

Finally, with inflation starting to pick back up and with all signs that Trump is serious about bringing investment back into the US market, metals and mining investments are an energy-agnostic way to position a portfolio for what Trump is planning, or indeed what other countries around the world need to grow their economies.  

Figure 2: Global Primary Energy growth since 1970

Crude Oil Nat Gas Coal Nuclear Hydro Renewables Resources Required Hydrocarbons Metals Units Exajoules % Change Exajoules % Change Exajoules % Change Exajoules % Change Exajoules % Change Exajoules % Change 1970 95 35 61 1 12 0 207 1980 128 34% 51 48% 75 22% 7 803% 17 47% 1 103% 279 37% 1990 136 6% 70 37% 95 24% 20 181% 22 25% 2 162% 342 22 % 2000 154 14% 86 23% 99 6% 26 29% 27 23% 3 68% 394 15 % 2010 173 12% 114 32% 151 53% 26 1% 32 22% 10 265% 505 28% 2020 174 1% 138 21% 151 0% 24 8% 38 18% 32 229% 557 10% Exajoules % Change 2023 196 14%* 144 27%* 164 9%* 25 6%* 40 24%* 51 406%* 620 23%* *2023 change vs 2010 Primary Energy Source Hydrocarbons Metals Hydrocarbons Metals Concrete Metals Concrete Metals Carbon Metals Source: 2024 Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy, RCF Analysis, December 2024

No matter which energy source is favoured in the future, growth in all six forms of primary energy depend on metals & mining.  

Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to our top stories.